In a move that could escalate tensions in the Middle East, US President Donald Trump has suggested the possibility of declaring the Strait of Hormuz as “a territory of the United States.” This declaration is part of the ongoing struggle between Washington and Tehran to reach a resolution on their conflict. Speaking in New York on Friday, Trump indicated that the declaration might occur “pretty soon” following a US victory over Iran. He also asserted that the US currently maintains control over this crucial waterway through a blockade.
The Strait of Hormuz is a pivotal maritime route, with about 20% of the world’s seaborne oil supplies typically traversing its waters. Situated between Iran and Oman, the strait has seen limited activity since military operations by the US and Israel commenced against Iran. The implications of Trump’s statement are uncertain, leaving it unclear if it signals an official shift in US policy or if it was merely a political remark.
Iran responded firmly to Trump’s threat, with Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi declaring that Tehran would not succumb to US pressure. He emphasized that Iran retains control over decisions concerning the opening or closing of the strait. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi also commented on the situation, noting that Iran has not opted to resume negotiations with the US, and that exchanges through intermediaries like Qatar and Pakistan do not amount to formal discussions.
Tehran has set several prerequisites for reopening the strait to shipping traffic, including demands for compensation for wartime damages, the lifting of sanctions, and the release of Iran’s frozen assets. The ongoing conflict and the disruption of shipping have led to increased fuel prices, placing additional burdens on consumers. President Trump defended the rise in prices, arguing that the higher costs are a necessary measure to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon.
The deadlock over the Strait of Hormuz continues to spark concerns about global energy supply stability and the broader economic repercussions of the conflict. As tensions persist, the world watches closely, aware of the potential implications for international markets and regional security.